Native Tokens vs Wrapped Tokens

Last reviewed:

Native Tokens vs Wrapped Tokens

Native tokens and wrapped tokens are fundamental concepts in the cryptocurrency ecosystem, each serving distinct purposes. Native tokens are the original digital assets created on a specific blockchain, such as Bitcoin on the Bitcoin blockchain or Ether on Ethereum. Wrapped tokens, on the other hand, are tokenized versions of cryptocurrencies that exist on a different blockchain than the original asset. They enable interoperability between blockchains, allowing assets to be used in decentralized applications (dApps) and other blockchain ecosystems. Understanding the differences, features, and use cases of these tokens is crucial for navigating the cryptocurrency landscape.

Overview

Native tokens are digital assets that are intrinsic to a specific blockchain. They are created and exist on their native blockchain, such as Bitcoin (BTC) on the Bitcoin blockchain or Ether (ETH) on the Ethereum blockchain. These tokens are used to incentivize network participants, pay for transaction fees, and secure the network through mechanisms like proof of work or proof of stake.

Wrapped tokens are digital assets that represent another cryptocurrency on a different blockchain. They are created by locking the original asset in a smart contract, which then issues an equivalent amount of the wrapped token on the target blockchain. This process allows the original asset to be used in ecosystems where it is not natively supported. For example, Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) is a token on the Ethereum blockchain that represents Bitcoin, enabling Bitcoin to be used in Ethereum-based decentralized finance ([DeFi) applications](/wiki/decentralized_finance_defi_applications).

Feature comparison

| Feature | Native Tokens | Wrapped Tokens |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Blockchain Origin | Exist on their native blockchain | Exist on a different blockchain |
| Interoperability | Limited to their native blockchain | Enable cross-chain functionality |
| Creation Process | Created through mining or staking | Created by locking original assets |
| Use in dApps | Limited to native blockchain dApps | Usable in dApps on other blockchains |
| Security | Secured by native blockchain protocols| Depends on smart contracts and custodians|
| Liquidity | High on native blockchain | Depends on demand and supply on target blockchain |

Key differences

The primary difference between native tokens and wrapped tokens lies in their blockchain origin and functionality. Native tokens are integral to their blockchain, serving as the primary medium of exchange and utility within that ecosystem. They are created through processes like mining, where computational power is used to solve complex mathematical problems, or staking, where tokens are held to support network operations.

Wrapped tokens, however, are designed to facilitate interoperability between different blockchains. They are created by locking the original asset in a smart contract, which then issues a wrapped version on another blockchain. This allows the original asset to be used in applications and ecosystems where it is not natively supported. The security of wrapped tokens depends on the integrity of the smart contract and the custodians holding the original asset.

Use cases

Native Tokens:

- Transaction Fees: Native tokens are used to pay for transaction fees on their respective blockchains. For example, Ether is used to pay for gas fees on the Ethereum network.
- Network Security: Native tokens incentivize network participants to secure the blockchain through mechanisms like proof of work or proof of stake.
- Utility and Governance: Some native tokens, like Ether, are used in smart contract execution and governance decisions within their blockchain ecosystem.

Wrapped Tokens:

- Interoperability: Wrapped tokens enable assets to be used across different blockchain ecosystems. For example, WBTC allows Bitcoin to be used in Ethereum-based DeFi applications.
- Liquidity Provision: Wrapped tokens can be used to provide liquidity in decentralized exchanges and lending platforms.
- Cross-chain Transactions: They facilitate cross-chain transactions and interactions, expanding the use cases of the original asset.

Market data

As of October 2023, native tokens like Bitcoin and Ether remain dominant in terms of market capitalization and trading volume. Bitcoin, the first cryptocurrency, continues to lead with a market cap exceeding $500 billion. Ether, the native token of Ethereum, follows with a market cap of over $200 billion.

Wrapped tokens, while smaller in market cap, play a crucial role in the DeFi ecosystem. Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) is one of the wrapped tokens, with a market cap of approximately $5 billion. It enables Bitcoin holders to participate in the Ethereum DeFi ecosystem, which has grown significantly in recent years.

See Also

- smart contract
- wrapped_usd_wusd
- introduction_of_wrapped_bitcoin_wbtc

Sources

- CoinDesk
- CoinTelegraph
- Tether.to

Native Tokens vs Wrapped Tokens

Use Cases of Native Tokens vs Wrapped Tokens

Last updated: September 3, 2026